This browser does not support the Video element.
WASHINGTON - President-elect Donald Trump’s decision to nominate Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is drawing sharp criticism from lawmakers and national security analysts over her past comments regarding Russia and Ukraine. Critics say her views could undermine U.S. security and intelligence partnerships.
Gabbard, a former Democratic congressional representative and Army National Guard veteran, has a controversial record, including her support for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s justification for invading Ukraine. In 2022, Gabbard echoed Moscow’s claim about U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine, a narrative widely debunked and identified as Russian propaganda.
Her nomination is set to face tough questions in the Senate, where both Republicans and Democrats are expected to grill her over her stance on Russia, Syria, and her suitability for leading the country’s intelligence community.
Why are Gabbard’s Russia comments controversial?
In the early days of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Gabbard voiced concerns about biolabs in Ukraine, which Moscow claimed were being used to create bioweapons. While she later clarified that she wasn’t accusing the U.S. or Ukraine of wrongdoing, her comments mirrored Russian propaganda and earned her praise from Russian state media.
She has also expressed skepticism about U.S. support for Ukraine, calling it antagonistic toward Russia. Critics, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., say her views could compromise U.S. intelligence operations. "Do you really want her to have all of the secrets of the United States and our defense intelligence agencies when she has so clearly been in Putin’s pocket?" Warren said on MSNBC.
Gabbard’s foreign policy stance and ties to Syria
Gabbard’s foreign policy approach has raised eyebrows for years. In 2017, she secretly met with Syrian President Bashar Assad, a close ally of Russia and Iran, despite U.S. sanctions and accusations of war crimes against his regime.
The meeting drew backlash from Democrats, who accused her of legitimizing Assad’s brutal leadership. Gabbard defended her decision, saying it was part of a pursuit of peace. However, her critics argue the meeting symbolized a troubling alignment with autocratic regimes.
This browser does not support the Video element.
Allies express concerns about intelligence cooperation
America’s intelligence-sharing allies are reportedly wary of Gabbard’s nomination. Analysts warn that her leadership could strain trust within the Five Eyes alliance, which includes the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Thomas Juneau, a former strategic analyst for Canada’s Department of National Defence, cautioned that Gabbard’s nomination could lead to selective sharing of intelligence. "This would negatively affect the Five Eyes, which is an extremely close partnership premised on an extraordinarily high level of trust," he said.
What happens next in Gabbard’s confirmation?
The Senate is expected to hold hearings on Gabbard’s nomination in the coming weeks. While some Republicans, like Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, have voiced confidence in her patriotism due to her military service, they also plan to question her about her past statements.
Trump has praised Gabbard for her willingness to challenge the establishment, describing her as a "courageous leader" who will reform U.S. intelligence operations.
If confirmed, Gabbard would oversee 18 intelligence agencies, including the CIA and NSA, and serve as the president’s principal intelligence adviser.
The Source:
This report includes information from the Associated Press.